Network Logo
Translate Page To German Tranlate Page To Spanish Translate Page To French Translate Page To Italian Translate Page To Japanese Translate Page To Korean Translate Page To Portuguese Translate Page To Chinese
  Number Times Read : 15      
Categories

Business
Business Management
Computers and Technology
Finances
Healthy Living
Internet
Leadership
Legal
Marketing
Politics
Self Help
World Affairs
 
Stats
Total Articles: 25290
Total Authors: 3543
Total Downloads: 391009


Newest Member
RJ Dudley
 


   

The Enterprise Network Saturation Point



[Valid RSS feed]  Category Rss Feed - http://www.LeadershipVillage.com/rss.php?rss=362
By : Barry Koplowitz    14 or more times read
Submitted 2008-10-20 21:44:21
Size doesn t matter it s the complexity that gets you

I have seen networks of less than two thousand nodes become so complex that they become essentially unmanageable, while networks of ten s of thousands of nodes are under control. The reasons vary but have several things in common.

They have grown organically rather than been designed. Each time a decision is made, there is insufficient concern and consideration for maintaining compatibility and manageability with already in place systems.

They lack current and actively maintained documentation.

There is little effort at virtualization and what is done may be done from a purely cost cutting perspective, as opposed to a performance and manageability perspective.

Too little of the design was based on a thorough Capacity Plan and therefore the components are unbalanced. This leads to periodic, but unpredicable, failures and other surprises.

Complexity grows ~exponentially to size

Unless a purposeful policy is in place and enforced, that states procedures and requirements for the design of new functionality, it will run wild. It doesn t have to be that way but it often is. If you add a second location and it is done differently than the first or you improve the second and leave the first alone, there is an increase in the requirements of maintenance that is far greater than the increase in size. In an environment with multiple locations, systems, operating systems or just different levels of releases, the complexity increases by a far greater value than the actual size. This increases the dollar cost of maintenance and the frequency of unpleasant surprises. Eventually, you will reach The Saturation Point.

The Saturation Point is reached when people, projects or events begin to collide

We all know how this goes, but often assume it is inevitable. It is not. It is simply a symptom of an enterprise having reached The Saturation Point. Here is a very brief sample list of other symptoms that are common but unhealthy.

No one team has the entire big picture.

Change management, as typically practiced, fails at the saturation point.

Errors due to incomplete upgrades.

There is a growing schism between version levels of operating systems, databases, middleware, etc, between one system and another.

Documentation is seriously out of date. True, documentation is almost always out of date but there are differences. In the environment I am describing, the documentation is completely untrustworthy and there is no Team or individual that is tasked with the responsibility for maintaining it. While this is a multi team responsibility, there should be one group that is commissioned with the authority to expect and demand updates from all the various teams maintaining their own documentation. This team maintains the Documentation Library for the enterprise.

Scheduled changes begin to conflict with each other frequently causing longer delays.

Increasing differences between systems that should be the same.

If you ever see two different groups running what amounts to the same project, in different ways, without doing so in concert with each other you are at The Saturation Point.

All of these events can be classified as Collisions.

Collisions cost money a lot of money

This is not just a nuisance; it is a money pit. Aside from discontented clients and employees, there is a cost associated with constant fixes. The mistake is to think that since these costs are fixed they are not real that you will pay it anyway. Thinking that the cost, being fixed, is less than the cost of paying additional funds to correct this level of complexity is simply wrong. Here is the TRUE COST. Your people are working on addressing old problems and mistakes, instead of facing forward and using their skills to address the new challenges and opportunities of the future. The near future as well as the mid and long term future.

The bottom line is that no company can afford to have products that are not their best, or to waste their best minds in turning the millstone. You are competing in a global economy and creativity, efficiency and innovation are the name of the game. Don t waste your resources on non functional, or dysfunctional procedures. For a company to be able to thrive in the twenty first century, it needs to be using its best people to anticipate and create, not play IT musical chairs.
Author Resource:- Barry Koplowitz founded http://www.interpathtech.com Interpath Technologies Corporation in 1999. He is an executive consultant to large enterprise environments in the area of Processes, Management, Network/Application Analysis and Troubleshooting. His methodical approach proves incontestable proof and real world solutions. He is the writer and host of http://www.itunes.com/podcast?id=270919666 The ROOT Cause podcast available on iTunes. http://www.interpathtech.com
Article From Leadership - Personal Excellence - Success

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.




Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual
New Members
select
Sign up
select
learn more
Affiliate Sign in
Affiliate Sign In
 
Nav Menu
Home
Login
Submit Articles
Submission Guidelines
Top Articles
Link Directory
About Us
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
RSS Feeds

Actions
Print This Article
Add To Favorites

 
Sponsors

Purchase this software

 

From Family Stew



The Free Ride In Public Schools
27 Nov 2008 at 11:28am
Why should public-school students bother doing homework or studying hard if they advance to the next grade no matter how bad they do in class? That would be dumb, and these kids are not dumb.
Punishing the Victim -- Why Public Schools Pressure Parents To Give Their Kid...
27 Nov 2008 at 11:28am
It is normal for bright, energetic kids to be bored in public school. To solve the problem of "unruly" children, public schools now pressure parents to give their kids potentially dangerous mind-altering drugs.
The Graceful Art of Defrazzling - For Mothers
27 Nov 2008 at 11:28am
An introduction to a "defrazzled" method of surviving life as a mother

From Expanding Links



What Can You Do To Beat Your Competition?
26 Nov 2008 at 3:57pm
Your competition is more established than your website is. How do you get ahead of them?
Methods of Website Promotion
26 Nov 2008 at 3:57pm
Some thoughts and experiences related to website promotion and methods for gaining added exposure...
How to Get Directories to Submit Your Site - With this 5 Steps Guide!
26 Nov 2008 at 3:57pm
Simple 5 steps guide to get all those directories for your site submission campaign.



If you are interested in learning about and discussing social services and social services agency management, please visit SocialServicesAgencyManagement.com where you will also learn about the new ecological model of excellence.

A Service Of: (©) Leadership Village - all rights reserved